Timothy D. Lyons and Steve Clarke Introduction: Scientific Realism and Commonsense
نویسندگان
چکیده
Scientific realism involves two key claims. First, science aims primarily at truth. Second, we can justifiably believe that our successful scientific theories achieve, or at least approximate, this aim. The contemporary scientific realism debate turns on the acceptability of these claims. To acquire a more robust picture of scientific realism, let us identify some of the related theses on which these key claims rest. In opposition to, say, solipsists, the scientific realist insists that there exists an 'external' world with which we interact. Contra social constructivists, the scientific realist holds that this world includes events, processes, and/or entities that are not contingent on our beliefs. Scientific realists take truth to be objective and to express a correspondence relation between statements and the world. Such a conception of truth is often juxtaposed against those conceptions espoused by internal realists (e.g., Hilary Putnam, Brian Ellis).! Opposing idealists such as Berkeley, the scientific realist maintains further that we can be justified in believing that the objects we observe exist and that our basic claims about their observable properties are true. In contrast to classical instrumentalists, such as Ernst Mach, positivists (e.g., Moritz Schlick, Rudolph Carnap) , as well as fictionalists, operationaiists, and phenomenalists, the scientific realist construes scientific theories literally; most terms contained in scientific theories are intended to refer to real entities.2 Scientific realists hold that, in general, theory change in science has been rational and progressive. Moreover, scientific realists tend to espouse the view that progress in science is determined by the extent to which its primary aim is achieved (or approximated). These tenets of scientific realism collectively serve to provide a framework within which the contemporary debate on scientific realism takes place. Most prominent contemporary opponents of scientific realism
منابع مشابه
Non-competitor Conditions in the Scientific Realism Debate
A general insight of 20th-century philosophy of science is that the acceptance of a scientific theory is grounded, not merely on a theory’s relation to data, but on its status as having no, or being superior to its, competitors. I explore the ways in which scientific realists might be thought to utilise this insight, have in fact utilised it, and can legitimately utilise it. In more detail, I p...
متن کاملScientific Realism - Oxford Handbooks
This article endeavors to identify the strongest versions of the two primary arguments against epistemic scientific realism: the historical argument—generally dubbed “the pessimistic meta-induction”—and the argument from underdetermination. It is shown that, contrary to the literature, both can be understood as historically informed but logically validmodus tollensarguments. After specifying th...
متن کاملA Historically Informed Modus Ponens Against Scientific Realism: Articulation, Critique, and Restoration
There are two primary arguments against scientific realism, one pertaining to underdetermination, the other to the history of science. While these arguments are usually treated as altogether distinct, P. Kyle Stanford’s ‘problem of unconceived alternatives’ constitutes one kind of synthesis: I propose that Stanford’s argument is best understood as a broad modus ponens underdetermination argumen...
متن کاملStructural realism versus deployment realism: A comparative evaluation.
In this paper I challenge and adjudicate between the two positions that have come to prominence in the scientific realism debate: deployment realism and structural realism. I discuss a set of cases from the history of celestial mechanics, including some of the most important successes in the history of science. To the surprise of the deployment realist, these are novel predictive successes towa...
متن کامل